In recent years, major food safety scandals have raised public awareness of the risks associated with the food supply chain. However, the source of contamination isn’t always what many might expect. While beef has historically been a common culprit, significant improvements in regulation have made beef-related outbreaks far less common.
The recent E. coli outbreak at McDonald’s has drawn attention to a new and growing issue: vegetable contamination. As major fast-food chains like McDonald’s and others pull fresh onions from their menus due to a potential link to E. coli, it reveals a much larger and more complex problem—vegetable contamination can be even harder to prevent than beef contamination.
Table of Contents
The E. coli Outbreak: McDonald’s Onions at the Center
The E. coli outbreak connected to McDonald’s has led to the illness of at least 75 people across the Midwest and Western states, with one reported death. Onions were identified as the likely source of the contamination, prompting McDonald’s to pull the Quarter Pounder burger from menus at about 20% of its 14,000 U.S. locations. Of those affected, 22 people were hospitalized, and two developed hemolytic uremic syndrome, a severe condition that can lead to kidney failure. This incident sheds light on the fragility of produce safety in large-scale food supply chains, where raw vegetables are inherently more vulnerable to contamination than beef.
Beef vs. Produce: A Comparison of Contamination Risks
In past years, beef patties dominated foodborne illness litigation and public health concerns. High-profile cases, such as the Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak in the early 1990s, led to significant federal intervention. Over 170 people were hospitalized in that outbreak, with four fatalities, resulting in stricter government regulations that drastically reduced beef-related incidents. According to experts, beef is now much safer than it once was, largely due to these regulations.
However, produce presents a more complex problem. As noted by Mike Taylor, a former food safety leader at both the FDA and USDA, and now a board member of the nonprofit STOP Foodborne Illness, “Produce is a much harder problem.” Unlike beef, which is typically cooked at high temperatures that can kill most bacteria, fresh vegetables are often consumed raw. Cooking acts as a “silver bullet” against contamination, but in the case of fresh produce like onions, this safeguard is absent. This means that even small amounts of contamination can lead to widespread illness.
The Challenges of Vegetable Contamination
Vegetable contamination is a multifaceted issue, exacerbated by the fact that crops are grown in outdoor environments that are difficult to control. Crops like onions are exposed to a range of potential contaminants, including feces from wildlife, contaminated irrigation water, and improper handling during processing. E. coli, a common bacterium found in the guts of animals, is one of the most prevalent threats. While cattle are often identified as the primary source of E. coli contamination, other animals such as deer, boars, and even birds can carry and spread the pathogen.
The challenge with vegetable contamination, as explained by food safety experts like Donald Schaffner from Rutgers University, is that even though large-scale industrial produce is washed, sanitized, and tested similarly to beef, the tests are not always effective. Contaminants can be present at levels too low for standard tests to detect, yet still be potent enough to cause illness when the produce is consumed. The irony is that the cleaner and better-sanitized the product, the harder it can be to detect any remaining contamination.
Mansour Samadpour, a food safety specialist and CEO of IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group, points out that despite rigorous testing procedures for both beef and produce, vegetable contamination remains a persistent issue. Even with advanced testing techniques, the limitations of current technology make it impossible to detect every trace of bacteria or pathogens.
Why Produce Contamination Is Harder to Control
There are several reasons why preventing contamination in vegetables is harder than in beef. One of the most significant is the inherent vulnerability of crops grown outdoors. Crops are exposed to a wide range of environmental factors, including wildlife, insects, and water sources that may be contaminated with bacteria like E. coli or salmonella. Unlike meat, which is produced and processed in controlled environments, vegetables are susceptible to contamination from a variety of sources, some of which are difficult to mitigate.
The use of untreated manure or contaminated irrigation water can introduce bacteria to crops, as can environmental events like flooding, which can carry contaminants from nearby farms or wildlife areas into fields. Improper handling during harvesting, processing, and transportation also increases the risk of contamination. For example, cutting or slicing vegetables can expose them to bacteria if the equipment used is not properly sanitized.
This problem is further complicated by the fact that consumers often expect produce to be fresh and unprocessed. This creates a challenge for food producers, as treating vegetables with methods that could kill bacteria—such as irradiation—often carries negative connotations and consumer resistance. As Samadpour notes, while radiation could destroy harmful microbes, it is not widely accepted due to the “ick factor” many consumers associate with irradiated food.
The Role of Fast-Food Chains in Improving Produce Safety
In light of these challenges, the role of major food buyers like fast-food chains in ensuring produce safety has become increasingly important. McDonald’s, along with its onion supplier Taylor Farms, is considered a leader in food safety practices. Both companies test produce frequently, and McDonald’s has confirmed that its suppliers tested the onions in question during the date range identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the outbreak. However, despite these efforts, the E. coli strain responsible for the outbreak was not detected.
This situation is not unique to McDonald’s. In 2022, Wendy’s faced a similar crisis when lettuce was suspected of causing an E. coli outbreak that sickened dozens of people. And in 2006, Taco Bell’s lettuce was linked to an E. coli outbreak that affected 71 people. These incidents highlight the broader challenge of ensuring produce safety across the entire fast-food industry.
As the fast-food industry has grown, so too has the complexity of its supply chains. Ensuring the safety of produce requires a coordinated effort from farmers, suppliers, and buyers. One potential solution, as suggested by Taylor, is for major buyers like McDonald’s and grocery chains to play a more active role in setting and enforcing safety standards. By “modernizing and harmonizing” the expectations they have for their suppliers, these companies could help create a more consistent and reliable standard for produce safety.
The Regulatory Landscape: Stricter Rules, But Gaps Remain
The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) of 2011 was a significant step forward in addressing the safety of produce. This law required the FDA to establish standards for the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables, areas that had previously been under-regulated. As Schaffner explains, “Very often the pattern is we have a public health problem or a food safety problem and eventually Congress will react, and we’ll have regulations.”
The FSMA has helped improve produce safety, but gaps remain. While government regulation has been effective in addressing beef contamination, the fragmented and diverse nature of the produce industry makes similar regulations harder to enforce. Unlike the beef industry, where a relatively small number of producers account for the majority of the supply, the produce industry is much more decentralized. This makes it more difficult to establish and enforce uniform safety standards across the board.
